The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 329:1263-1265 October 21, 1993 Number 17
NextNext

The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring It

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Underlying the expectation that physicians, health plans, and other organizations will soon be competing on the basis of the quality as well as the cost of medical care1 is the fundamental assumption that we know what quality is and how to measure it, monitor it, and ensure it. This is a proposition devoutly to be wished, and one to which millions of dollars will be devoted. But how accurate is it?

A large industry is developing standards of quality against which physicians and health care organizations will be judged. These standards, or practice guidelines, are based on existing controlled clinical . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Appropriateness Studies
Black N., Park R. E., Brook R. H., Dubois R. W., Hall M. A., Phelps C. E., Kassirer J. P.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 330:432-434, Feb 10, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.