The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:1086-1088 April 14, 1994 Number 15
NextNext

The Case for the Clinton Plan for Health Care Reform

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Starr, P.
To the Editor: Despite its impressive scope and detail, Starr's description of the Health Security plan (Nov. 25 issue)1 neglected a key element of health care reform: the content of the federally mandated minimal-benefit package. Its content will determine whether the plan can achieve its principal objectives.

One policy option that might promote agreement on a basic benefit package would be to distinguish explicitly between necessary and elective medical services and to structure the benefits differently for these two types of care. Under such a plan, medically necessary care would be covered completely, but patients would make mandatory copayments for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.