When it comes to announcing an effective treatment for a currentlyuntreatable disease, investigators have a grave responsibility.Bensimon et al.1 report in this issue of the Journal that riluzole,a glutamate antagonist, increased survival in one group of patientswith amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) but was not helpfulin another group of patients with the same disease. Thereinlies a medical mystery.
The cause of sporadic ALS is not known. A familial form accountsfor about 5 percent of all cases and, in about 40 percent ofthe families, can be mapped to the gene for superoxide dismutaseon . . . [Full Text of this Article]
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
McDermott, M. P., Rowland, L. P.
(2001). ALS defeats gabapentin: Reflections on another failed treatment. Neurology
56: 826-826
[Full Text]
Muir, K. W., Lees, K. R.
(1995). Clinical Experience With Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonist Drugs. Stroke
26: 503-513
[Abstract][Full Text]
McKee, P., Fuller, G. N., Stevens, D. L., MacRae, K. D., Burgerman, R. S., Rogawski, M. A., Murphy, J. R., Bensimon, G., Lacomblez, L., Meininger, V., Rowland, L. P., Caillard, C.G., Louvel, E., Randle, J.C.R.
(1994). Riluzole in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. NEJM
331: 272-274
[Full Text]