FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 331:54-55 July 7, 1994 Number 1 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Steiner, C. A. PubMed Citation

To the Editor: Steiner et al., in their report on operative mortality among patients undergoing cholecystectomy (Feb. 10 issue),¹ blame the absence of a significant reduction in total mortality after the adoption of the laparoscopic technique on the increase in the overall rate of the procedure. I believe that this deduction is not correct.

Let us imagine that the laparoscopic technique was available and was as widely used in 1985 as it was in 1992, that the number of patients who underwent the procedure in 1985 was unchanged (7215), and that the rates of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in 1985 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References

HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.