The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 331:1099 October 20, 1994 Number 16
NextNext

Science in the Courtroom

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Angell, M.
To the Editor: Dr. Angell editorializes (June 16 issue)1 on her concern about the presentation of medical evidence in the courtroom, particularly in relation to the controversy swirling around breast implants. I also hope that the courts will develop better policies in the future, because the problems are likely to get even more complex.

I have an additional concern. With respect to the large compensation fund established, many of the women with breast implants who may opt for settlement have been sent lists of criteria for compensation to be awarded in various categories. They will then go out, armed with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.