In today's prescription-drug marketplace a host of similar productscompete for essentially the same population of patients. Between1989 and 1993, for example, the Center for Drug Evaluation andResearch of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved127 new molecular entities (excluding generic drugs), but onlya minority offered a clear clinical advantage over existingtherapies1. Many of the others are considered "me too" drugsbecause they are so similar to brand-name drugs already on themarket.
The preponderance of "me too" drugs has created a highly competitivemarketplace for prescription drugs. Pharmaceutical companiesare waging aggressive campaigns . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Crowded Therapeutic Classes
Seeding Trials
False and Misleading Claims
Switch Campaigns
Conclusions
Source Information
From the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md.
Address reprint requests to Ms. Rose at the FDA, Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-240, 5600 Fishers Ln., Rockville, MD 20857.
References
Related Letters:
Drug Promotion
Hoberman D., Puma J. L., Cohen S. N., Mossinghoff G. J., Stryer D. B., Bero L. A., Kalish R. S., Kessler D. A., Rose J. L., Temple R. J., Schapiro R., Griffin J. P., Stern R. S.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 1995;
332:1031-1033, Apr 13, 1995.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Egilman, D.
(2009). Just say no. BMJ
339: b4527-b4527
[Full Text]
Wynia, M., Boren, D.
(2009). Better regulation of industry-sponsored clinical trials is long overdue.. J Law Med Ethics
37: 410-419
Nijsten, T., Spuls, P. I., Naldi, L., Stern, R. S.
(2009). The Misperception That Clinical Trial Data Reflect Long-term Drug Safety: Lessons Learned From Efalizumab's Withdrawal. Arch Dermatol
145: 1037-1039
[Full Text]
Edelman, J. M.
(2008). ADVANTAGE: Science First, Marketing Second. ANN INTERN MED
149: 773-773
[Full Text]
Hill, K. P., Egilman, D. S., Krumholz, H. M.
(2008). ADVANTAGE: Science First, Marketing Second. ANN INTERN MED
149: 773-774
[Full Text]
Booth, C. M., Mackillop, W. J.
(2008). Translating New Medical Therapies Into Societal Benefit: The Role of Population-Based Outcome Studies. JAMA
300: 2177-2179
[Full Text]
Hill, K. P., Ross, J. S., Egilman, D. S., Krumholz, H. M.
(2008). The ADVANTAGE Seeding Trial: A Review of Internal Documents. ANN INTERN MED
149: 251-258
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sox, H. C., Rennie, D.
(2008). Seeding Trials: Just Say "No". ANN INTERN MED
149: 279-280
[Full Text]
Katz, K. A.
(2008). Time to Nip "Seeding Trials" in the Bud. Arch Dermatol
144: 403-404
[Full Text]
Psaty, B. M., Rennie, D.
(2006). Clinical Trial Investigators and Their Prescribing Patterns: Another Dimension to the Relationship Between Physician Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry. JAMA
295: 2787-2790
[Full Text]
Brodkey, A. C.
(2005). The Role of the Pharmaceutical Industry in Teaching Psychopharmacology: A Growing Problem. Acad. Psychiatry
29: 222-229
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kennedy, H. L., Rosenson, R. S.
(2002). Physicians' interpretation of "class effects": A need for thoughtful re-evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol
40: 19-26
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bodenheimer, T. S.
(2001). Affordable Prescriptions for the Elderly. JAMA
286: 1762-1763
[Full Text]
Mamdani, M. M., Tu, J. V.
(2001). Did the major clinical trials of statins affect prescribing behaviour?. CMAJ
164: 1695-1696
[Full Text]
Junker, C., Egger, M., Schneider, M., Zellweger, T., Antes, G.
(1996). The CONSORT Statement. JAMA
276: 1876-1877
[Abstract]
Cohen, J. S., Insel, P. A.
(1996). The Physicians' Desk Reference: Problems and Possible Improvements. Arch Intern Med
156: 1375-1380
[Abstract]
Coller, B. S.
(1995). Blockade of Platelet GPIIb/IIIa Receptors as an Antithrombotic Strategy. Circulation
92: 2373-2380
[Full Text]
Hoberman, D., Puma, J. L., Cohen, S. N., Mossinghoff, G. J., Stryer, D. B., Bero, L. A., Kalish, R. S., Kessler, D. A., Rose, J. L., Temple, R. J., Schapiro, R., Griffin, J. P., Stern, R. S.
(1995). Drug Promotion. NEJM
332: 1031-1033
[Full Text]