|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Well, have you actually tried what you're proposing?" I sheepishly admitted I had not. The setting was the 1993 International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, and I had just spoken on book reviews as a form of peer review. I had suggested publishing "structured book reviews" akin to the structured abstracts that accompany journal articles, speculating that such reviews would be easier to write than conventional reviews, would tend to be more complete, and would make the presented information more accessible to readers.
Struggling to compose this review, I recalled my remarks. "What better time to try writing
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |