FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 333:654-655 September 7, 1995 Number 10 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

It's open season on the policies and opinions of journal editors, which provide an exciting new target for writers, commentators, and even fellow editors.^{1,2,3,4,5,6,7} Now well into my fifth year as editor-in-chief of the oldest, largest (in paid subscriptions), and arguably, best-known medical journal, I've dodged a modest barrage of arrows. Stories in national periodicals and newspapers and on the radio have claimed that the Journal suppresses the publication of important studies^8,9 and delays releasing information critical to the health of the public.^3,4,5 One editor argued that our conflict-of-interest policy unfairly labels authors as biased,⁷ and another was critical of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Tobin, M. J. (2004). American in Name, International in Scope. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 169: 1083-1085 [Full Text]  
• Kassirer, J. P. (1996). The Journal's New Look. NEJM 335: 50-51 [Full Text]