|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philosophers, notoriously, are an ivory-towered lot. One philosopher who has never fit that mold is the Australian Peter Singer. Indeed, he has probably had a larger popular readership than any professional philosopher since Bertrand Russell, and more success in effecting changes in acceptable behavior. Interestingly, Singer is an adherent of a moral theory similar to Russell's, the very modern, Western, democratic (and some would say very British) theory of Utilitarianism. Utilitarian moral theory is the philosophical equivalent of outcomes research in medicine; it posits that it is the consequences that count, and that success (or failure) is the major determinant
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |