The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Book Review
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:139-140 July 11, 1996 Number 2
NextNext

Medical Malpractice and the American Jury: Confronting the myths about jury incompetence, deep pockets, and outrageous damage awards

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
By Neil Vidmar. 318 pp. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1995. $34.50. ISBN 0-472-10639-2.

This book deals only with juries in medical-malpractice cases, not with the tort-litigation system, although the jury has a central role in that system. The author challenges the view that juries are irrational, biased against physicians and hospitals, overgenerous to plaintiffs, and ready to go for the deep pockets of insurance companies.

The book is based on the author's study of 895 North Carolina lawsuits, representing 95 percent of those filed from July 1, 1984, through June 30, 1987. Of these cases, about half were settled before trial, and 40 percent were dropped. Only 118 reached the trial stage. Three . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.