The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:1601-1604 November 21, 1996 Number 21
NextNext

The HMO Backlash — Righteous or Reactionary?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
The membership of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) now exceeds 50 million people and may grow by an additional 50 million by the year 2000. But all is not well in HMO-land. An angry and determined backlash is spreading across the nation. In 1996 alone, 1000 pieces of legislation attempting to regulate or weaken HMOs were introduced in state legislatures, and 56 laws were passed in 35 states. The backlash movement brings together patients who complain of services denied and physicians who are suffering the loss of autonomy and income.1 There are several manifestations of the backlash: federal and state legislation, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Issues Underlying the Backlash against HMOs

Restrictions on Physicians' Autonomy

Choice of Providers

Access to Care

The Profit Incentives of Managed Care

Other Forms of Backlash

Physician-Run Managed Care

Efforts to Cripple Managed Care

Whither the Backlash?

Evaluating the Backlash

Will the Backlash Succeed?

References


Related Letters:

A Fetal Yawn?
McManus B., Devine P., Brandstetter R. D., Egerman R. S., Emerson D. S.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1329-1331, May 1, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.