The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 336:804-807 March 13, 1997 Number 11
NextNext

Series on the Quality of Health Care

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Blumenthal, D.
-Related Article
 by Brook, R. H.
-Related Article
 by Blumenthal, D.
-Related Article
 by Berwick, D. M.
-Related Article
 by Blumenthal, D.
To the Editor: In "Quality of Care — What Is It?" (Sept. 19 issue),1 the first article in the series on the quality of health care, Blumenthal asks the wrong question. He should have asked, "Who should be the judge?" Blumenthal discusses how the experts and central planners try to determine what is good health care. This top-down method will not work. Choices about quality in medicine are no different from choices about quality in other areas of life, such as purchasing an automobile. Would we turn over to auto makers the task of deciding which car is best for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.