The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 336:1101-1103 April 10, 1997 Number 15
NextNext

Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
by Grines, C. L.
-Related Article
by Every, N. R.
-Related Article
by Lange, R. A.
To the Editor: In the clinical debate over the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction (Oct. 24 issue),1,2 Lange and Hillis argue in favor of thrombolysis. Table 2 in their rebuttal contains two important errors that may mislead many readers. First, the cited report by Eckman et al.3 is a pooled analysis that included 614 patients from the study by O'Keefe et al.,4 originally reported by Kahn et al.5 In addition, 383 patients from the study by Brodie et al.6 were included in the pooled analysis by Eckman et al.3 Therefore, 997 patients treated with primary angioplasty are represented . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.