The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:1236-1239 October 23, 1997 Number 17
NextNext

The Supreme Court and Physician-Assisted Suicide — Rejecting Assisted Suicide but Embracing Euthanasia

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
In rejecting a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide earlier this year,1,2 the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to preserve the distinction between the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and assisted suicide or euthanasia. In fact, however, the Court undermined the distinction when it endorsed terminal sedation. Terminal sedation seems consistent with traditional medical care but often is a form of euthanasia. Moreover, it is a practice that is ethically more problematic than assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia.

The Supreme Court's Opinions

In deciding against a right to assisted suicide, the Court faced the claim that such a right is necessary for some patients to ensure that . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Terminal Sedation

Terminal Sedation as a Form of Euthanasia

Terminal Sedation versus Assisted Suicide

Address reprint requests to Dr. Orentlicher, Visiting DeCamp Professor of Bioethics, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, 5 Ivy Ln., Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.

References


Related Letters:

Terminal Sedation
Tonelli M. R., Lynn J., Orentlicher D.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1230-1231, Apr 23, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.