FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 338:995-996 April 2, 1998 Number 14 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Shuster, E.

To the Editor: In her review of the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial and its legacy (Nov. 13 issue),¹ Dr. Shuster devotes considerable space to an attempt by the Nazi defendants to equate experiments on inmates of concentration camps with American research on state and federal prisoners during World War II. I give credit to Shuster for paying attention to this often-overlooked aspect of the proceedings, but I found her analysis to fall seriously short of the full story.

Shuster suggests that Andrew Ivy, the American Medical Association's expert consultant to the prosecutors, was called to rebut Werner Leibbrand's criticism of research . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References

HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.