The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correction to Ferzoco et al., N Engl J Med 338(21):1521-1526 May 21, 1998.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:1081-1083 October 8, 1998 Number 15
NextNext

Acute Diverticulitis

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Ferzoco, L.B.
-Related Article
 by Ferzoco, L.B.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: I was disappointed that Ferzoco et al. (May 21 issue)1 in their fine review of diverticulitis did not emphasize more strongly that it is mandatory to do further diagnostic testing in many patients rather than to rely solely on clinical findings. Fleischner and Ming2 could not find evidence of inflammation in 25 percent of specimens from patients who underwent resection for diverticulitis; Morson3 reported that inflammation was absent in 33 percent of patients. Presumably, these patients represented the sickest patients, because they underwent surgery.

In many patients, the distinction between inflammatory diverticulitis and muscle-spasm diverticulosis can be . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.