FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 339:1371-1374 November 5, 1998 Number 19 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Implantable cardioverter–defibrillators have an important role in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Electromagnetic interference with permanent pacemakers and implantable defibrillators may have deleterious effects.^{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11} Electronic antitheft-surveillance devices, which are widely used in stores, libraries, and other places to prevent theft, are a potential source of electromagnetic interference. Approximately 400,000 of these devices are in use worldwide.

Electromagnetic interference with implantable defibrillators can generally be divided into four types. The most common type involves an overcounting of the ventricular rate. Misinterpretation of rapid rates may lead to inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or the delivery of shocks. Since the current generation . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Case Report

Discussion

Source Information

From the Section of Cardiology, Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's Medical Center, 1753 W. Congress Pky., Chicago, IL 60612, where reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Santucci.

References

Related Letters:

Implantable Defibrillators, Pacemakers, and Electronic Antitheft Devices
Harthorne J. W., Barach P., Baum E., Santucci P. A., Pinski S. L., Trohman R. G., McIvor M. E., Sridhar S.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1117-1119, Apr 8, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• van der Togt, R., Jan van Lieshout, E., Hensbroek, R., Beinat, E., Binnekade, J. M., Bakker, P. J. M. (2008). Electromagnetic Interference From Radio Frequency Identification Inducing Potentially Hazardous Incidents in Critical Care Medical Equipment. JAMA 299: 2884-2890 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gimbel, J. R., Cox, J. W. Jr (2007). Electronic Article Surveillance Systems and Interactions With Implantable Cardiac Devices: Risk of Adverse Interactions in Public and Commercial Spaces. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 318-322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Al Khadra, A. S., Al Jutaily, A., Al Shuhri, S. (2006). Detection of refrigerator-associated 60 Hz alternating current as ventricular fibrillation by an implantable defibrillator.. Europace 8: 175-177 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kolb, C., Schmieder, S., Lehmann, G.u., Zrenner, B., Karch, M. R., Plewan, A., Schmitt, C. (2003). Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators?. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 2054-2059 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chiladakis, J.A, Davlouros, P, Agelopoulos, G, Manolis, A.S (2001). In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Eur Heart J 22: 1337-1342 [Abstract]  
• Groh, W. J., Boschee, S. A., Engelstein, E. D., Miles, W. M., Burton, M. E., Foster, P. R., Crevey, B. J., Zipes, D. P. (1999). Interactions Between Electronic Article Surveillance Systems and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. Circulation 100: 387-392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Harthorne, J. W., Barach, P., Baum, E., Santucci, P. A., Pinski, S. L., Trohman, R. G., McIvor, M. E., Sridhar, S. (1999). Implantable Defibrillators, Pacemakers, and Electronic Antitheft Devices. NEJM 340: 1117-1119 [Full Text]