|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the current debate about physician-assisted suicide, proponents argue that legalization would respect contemporary values of patient autonomy and that the practice, if legalized, would be limited in application. Opponents maintain that physician-assisted suicide would violate contemporary values because it would be applied both coercively and extensively. Most of the essays in this collection acknowledge that physician-assisted suicide would indeed constitute a change in contemporary values and that the practice might become widespread; nonetheless, they convincingly show that these propositions are not in themselves sufficient ground either to support or to oppose its legalization. These essays, most by philosophers, thus
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |