|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It was probably inevitable, but is nonetheless welcome, that the troubled American conversation about the sexes would one day open up into a thoughtful consideration of what boys are fundamentally like and how they might best thrive. Until just past the midpoint of this century, the health and educational establishments drew their analyses from and directed their prescriptions to children generally. Sex-related peculiarities and differences were implicitly held to be less compelling than the universality of childhood experience. Thus, classic guides to child development from Benjamin Spock to Erik Erikson discuss childhood more or less generically. And although Erikson might
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |