The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 340:1671-1672 May 27, 1999 Number 21
NextNext

Editorial Independence

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
After the summary dismissal of the editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) several months ago, protests about the violation of editorial independence appeared in the pages of many medical journals.1,2,3,4 Despite strenuous denials by the AMA, the firing of the editor of JAMA because of the publication of a single article was an obvious infringement of the journal's editorial independence. In an editorial written soon after his dismissal, I described the episode as an ominous precedent.5 Responses to that editorial (which appear in this issue of the Journal6,7), as well as the comments . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Expediting Publication to Inform Political Debates
Phillips R. L., Rainey C. J., Tuohy E. R., Sade R. M., Hickman J. R., Burchell M. C., Parmet A.J., Scalettar R., Granat P.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1681-1683, May 27, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.