When Dr. E. Ratcliffe Anderson, the American Medical Association'sexecutive vice president, announced on January 15, 1999, thathe had fired the editor-in-chief of the Journal of the AmericanMedical Association (JAMA), he said that an important factorin his decision was the publication of a research article onthe sexual attitudes of college students. It was not just thecontent of the article that was at issue, he said, but the factthat the article had been advanced for publication ahead ofschedule with the intent of influencing a major political debate.In this case, the issue studied was . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Kassirer, J. P
(2007). Assault on editorial independence: improprieties of the Canadian Medical Association. J. Med. Ethics
33: 63-66
[Full Text]
Bernhard, J. D.
(2000). Read the Lancet, or Else!. Arch Dermatol
136: 602-605
[Full Text]
Parmley, W. W.
(2000). What did we learn from the New England Journal of Medicine?. J Am Coll Cardiol
35: 254-254
[Full Text]
Clark, J. P, Showalter, E.
(1999). Babes and boobs? Analysis of JAMA cover art • Commentary: An inconclusive study. BMJ
319: 1603-1605
[Abstract][Full Text]
Davies, H. T. O., Rennie, D.
(1999). Independence, Governance, and Trust: Redefining the Relationship Between JAMA and the AMA. JAMA
281: 2344-2346
[Full Text]
Kassirer, J. P.
(1999). Editorial Independence. NEJM
340: 1671-1672
[Full Text]
Phillips, R. L., Rainey, C. J., Tuohy, E. R., Sade, R. M., Hickman, J. R., Burchell, M. C., Parmet, A.J., Scalettar, R., Granat, P.
(1999). Expediting Publication to Inform Political Debates. NEJM
340: 1681-1683
[Full Text]
Davidoff, F.
(1999). The Making and Unmaking of a Journal. ANN INTERN MED
130: 774-775
[Full Text]