An apparent ethical dilemma arises when physicians considerenrolling their patients in randomized clinical trials. Supposethat a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments isin progress, and a physician has an opinion about which treatmentis better. The physician has a duty to promote the patient'sbest medical interests and therefore seems to be obliged toadvise the patient to receive the treatment that the physicianprefers. This duty creates a barrier to the enrollment of patientsin randomized clinical trials.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Two strategiesare often used to resolve the dilemma in favor of enrollingpatients in clinical trials.
The "Either You Know Which is Better or You Don't" Strategy
Ethics of Clinical Trials
Butow P. N., M.Litt.(Psych.) R. F. B., Tattersall M. H.N., Strandness D.E., Morris D., Rosenzweig S., Duggan A., Marquis D.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 2000;
342:978-980, Mar 30, 2000.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Mann, H., London, A. J., Mann, J.
(2005). Equipoise in the Enhanced Supression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Trial (ESPRIT): a critical appraisal. Clin Trials
2: 233-243
[Abstract]
Kodish, E., Eder, M., Noll, R. B., Ruccione, K., Lange, B., Angiolillo, A., Pentz, R., Zyzanski, S., Siminoff, L. A., Drotar, D.
(2004). Communication of Randomization in Childhood Leukemia Trials. JAMA
291: 470-475
[Abstract][Full Text]
Grunberg, S. M., Cefalu, W. T.
(2003). The Integral Role of Clinical Research in Clinical Care. NEJM
348: 1386-1388
[Full Text]
Stevenson, L. W., Kormos, R. L.
(2001). Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design: June 15-16, 2000 Bethesda, Maryland. J Am Coll Cardiol
37: 340-370
[Full Text]
Butow, P. N., M.Litt.(Psych.), R. F. B., Tattersall, M. H.N., Strandness, D.E., Morris, D., Rosenzweig, S., Duggan, A., Marquis, D.
(2000). Ethics of Clinical Trials. NEJM
342: 978-980
[Full Text]