FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 342:1219-1221 April 20, 2000 Number 16 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Dam, J. V. Related Article by Brugge, W. R. PubMed Citation

To the Editor: In their otherwise excellent review of endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract, Drs. Van Dam and Brugge (Dec. 2 issue)¹ start with a discussion of the likely economic benefits of performing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without using sedation. They appear to imply that this practice would be acceptable only with the use of "ultrathin" flexible endoscopes (6 mm in diameter).

In the United Kingdom, the practice of performing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation in selected patients has become more common over the past few years, even with conventional 9-to-11-mm endoscopes. Thus, although a 1991 British Society of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References

HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.