FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 342:524 February 17, 2000 Number 7

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100% of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Fenlon, H. M.

A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps . On page 1500, the sentence that begins four lines from the bottom of the left-hand column should have read, "The positive and negative predictive values were 84 and 82 percent, respectively," not "82 and 84 percent, respectively," as printed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Zalis, M. E., Perumpillichira, J. J., Magee, C., Kohlberg, G., Hahn, P. F. (2006). Tagging-based, Electronically Cleansed CT Colonography: Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Image Readability.. Radiology 239: 149-159 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rabeneck, L., Paszat, L. F. (2003). Colorectal cancer screening in Canada: Why not consider nurse endoscopists?. CMAJ 169: 206-207 [Full Text]