The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 342:664-665 March 2, 2000 Number 9
NextNext

Toll Genes and Responsiveness to Bacterial Endotoxins

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Modlin, R. L.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The review of the toll-like receptors (TLRs) by Modlin et al. (June 10 issue)1 contained some important errors. The authors contend that TLR2 signals the presence of endotoxin, and thus alerts the host to invading gram-negative bacteria. This is wrong. TLR4 carries out this function. The genetic evidence is categorical. Animals lacking TLR4 do not respond to endotoxin and have increased susceptibility to overwhelming gram-negative sepsis.2 Animals without TLR2, in contrast, have a completely normal response to both endotoxin and gram-negative bacterial infection.3 These facts cannot be reconciled with the claim that TLR2 transmits the lipopolysaccharide signal. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.