The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 343:223-225 July 20, 2000 Number 3
NextNext

Death and the Research Imperative

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Callahan, D.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: In his thoughtful and provocative essay, Callahan (March 2 issue)1 suggests that modern medicine may feel itself compelled "to overcome death itself" rather than to follow the humanistic logic of accepting death (when appropriate) in order to make dying as tolerable as possible. Callahan's concept of a research imperative, or even the technological imperative to which he alludes, may not be as responsible as the current "treatment imperative" for influencing modern health care. Many physicians are made to feel that the death of a patient represents a failure on their part. "Report cards" and other consumer health-outcome . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.