The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:912-914 September 20, 2001 Number 12
NextNext

Withholding Proven Treatment in Clinical Research

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Emanuel, E. J.
-PubMed Citation
The use of placebo-controlled trials began just before World War II, and the Declaration of Helsinki, which arose from the Nuremberg Code, was formulated after the war. Placebo-controlled studies soon became the gold standard of evidence, and the Declaration of Helsinki became the gold standard of research ethics. However, the practices of the first collided with the principles of the second, and researchers and ethicists have been trying to resolve this problem ever since. The debate over placebo-controlled trials is implicitly and inextricably linked to concern about withholding treatment — specifically, withholding proven or standard treatment — in the course . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.