The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:1701-1704 December 6, 2001 Number 23
NextNext

Will Parity in Coverage Result in Better Mental Health Care?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
"Equality between mental health coverage and other health coverage is an affordable and effective objective," according to a 1999 report by the Surgeon General.1 On the basis of this conclusion and because of the limited effect of the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 (which expired September 30), Senators Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) and Paul Wellstone (D-Minn.) introduced the Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act of 2001 (S. 543), which was recently approved by the Senate. Since the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 focused on only one type of difference between insurance coverage for mental health and general medical coverage (yearly . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Why We Do Not Have Parity Already

Why Parity Is Feasible Now

Why Parity Is Not Enough

Conclusions

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.