The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Health Policy Report
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:1296-1302 October 17, 2002 Number 16

The Debate over Residents' Work Hours
Robert Steinbrook, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Drazen, J. M.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
After years of discussion, the system of training resident physicians in the United States is about to undergo substantial changes. As of July 1, 2003, more — but not all — residents will be limited to 80 hours of work per week, averaged over a four-week period.1,2

The new requirements are part of a general effort to improve the safety of patients and the working conditions and education of residents. They are also designed to forestall federal regulation that could take away some of the authority of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the organization that accredits residency-education . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Background

Calculating Work Hours

Reasons to Limit Work Hours

Problems with Limiting Hours

The 80-Hour Workweek

The Role of the ACGME

Reviews of Programs

Current Duty-Hour Requirements

The General-Surgery Program at Yale

Work-Hour Limits in New York State

The New Accreditation Standards

Concern about the New Standards

The Effect on Hospitals and Training Programs

The Costs of Compliance

The Prospect of More Federal and State Regulation

The Future


Related Letters:

Residents' Work Hours
Crausman R. S., Mullins M. D., Mascolo M. C., Watson P. Y., Potee R., Blalock A., Rosen I. M., Shea J. A., Bellini L. M., Steinbrook R.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 348:664-666, Feb 13, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.