The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:2073-2076 December 19, 2002 Number 25
NextNext

Botanical Medicines — The Need for New Regulations

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Straus, S. E.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
In 2001, $17.8 billion was spent in the United States on dietary supplements, $4.2 billion of it for herbs and other botanical remedies.1 The popularity of these products has increased over the past decade, probably stimulated by sharp increases in prices of prescription drugs, restricted access to physicians imposed by managed care, media reports of adverse effects of prescription drugs, and, most important, the enactment in 1994 of the Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act (DSHEA). By broadly defining herbs and other botanicals as "dietary supplements," the DSHEA substantially altered the definitions, standards, and mechanisms under which claims about the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Lack of Standardization

Adulteration of Botanical Preparations

Interactions between Herbs and Drugs

Lack of Reporting of Adverse Events

Current Regulation of Botanical Medicines

The Need for New Regulations

Conclusions


Related Letters:

Herbal Medicine
Lipman M. M., McGuffin M., Wollschlaeger B. A., Goadsby P. J., Marcus D. M., Grollman A. P., De Smet P. A.G.M.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1498-1501, Apr 10, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.