The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:2165-2168 December 26, 2002 Number 26
NextNext

Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by MacGillivray, T. E.
-Related Article
 by Diegeler, A.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: In the clinical trial reported by Diegeler et al. (Aug. 22 issue),1 surgery was much more effective than stenting with regard to the prospectively established end point of a major adverse cardiac event (which occured in 31 percent of the patients in the stenting group vs. 15 percent in the surgery group, P=0.02) and with regard to freedom from angina (79 percent in the surgery group vs. 62 percent in the stenting group, P=0.03). Nonetheless, the authors conclude that "stenting yields excellent short-term results." Are they referring to a time point earlier than six months? If so, . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.