|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whatever their nature, letters to the editor were much appreciated by the addressee. They kept him and his Journal on their toes. They identified errors that would otherwise go unnoticed. They brought controversy out into the open. Moreover, their variety, brevity and frequent sparkle contributed in a fresh and informal way to the Journal's appeal.1
Written a quarter-century ago by former editor Franz J. Ingelfinger, this description of the Journal's Correspondence section is still accurate today. Letters to the editor have two important functions. They provide a forum for readers to comment about articles recently published in the
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |