The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correction to Gaspoz et al., N Engl J Med 346(23):1800-1806 June 6, 2002.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 348:560-563 February 6, 2003 Number 6
NextNext

Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Disease

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PDF of corrected article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Wood, A. J.J.
-Related Article
 by Gaspoz, J.-M.
-Related Article
 by Gaspoz, J.-M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Gaspoz et al. (June 6 issue)1 present an interesting perspective on the problem of escalating health care costs. Their comparison between the cost effectiveness of aspirin and that of clopidogrel is commendable, given the increasing focus by the public on the costs of newer drugs. In their analysis, the authors' assumptions about the costs of the drugs do not take into consideration future costs that would be expected to be lower for both brand-name and generic versions of clopidogrel.

Estimates of the cost of developing a new drug vary, with some figures as high as $800 million.2 . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.