The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 348:664-666 February 13, 2003 Number 7
NextNext

Residents' Work Hours

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Gaba, D. M.
-Related Article
 by Weinstein, D. F.
-Related Article
 by Steinbrook, R.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: In his Health Policy Report on the debate over residents' work hours (Oct. 17 issue),1 Steinbrook notes that "for teaching hospitals, the work-hour limits are an unfunded mandate." Although many argue that such limitations may adversely affect the training experience or, perversely, even patient care, it is clear that much of the concern is related to the anticipated cost of compliance. Dissatisfaction, depression, divorce, impairment, and suicide among residents are the cost of the status quo.

Hospitals have doubly benefited from house staff — both by having work done that would otherwise have had to be done . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.