The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 350:2206-2209 May 20, 2004 Number 21
NextNext

Vasopressin versus Epinephrine for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
by McIntyre, K. M.
-Related Article
by Wenzel, V.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: We congratulate Wenzel et al. (Jan. 8 issue)1 on their study of vasopressor treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The accompanying editorial by McIntyre2 urges an immediate change to resuscitation protocols. The American Heart Association and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation are engaged in an evidence-based review of the literature on resuscitation, which will culminate in an international consensus conference in January 2005, followed by treatment recommendations. During this process, more than 250 resuscitation experts analyze and debate all the available data on resuscitation. Expert debate is needed in the interpretation of the post hoc subgroup analyses . . . [Full Text of this Article]



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.