The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2004;350(15):1586.

Perspective
Volume 350:211-212 January 15, 2004 Number 3
NextNext

"Me-Too" Products — Friend or Foe?
Thomas H. Lee, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
- Return to Search Result
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
-Related Article
 by Stone, G. W.
-PubMed Citation
A second drug-eluting coronary stent. Another drug for erectile dysfunction. A sixth statin (or seventh, counting cerivastatin). Medical journals seem filled with research articles that induce a sense of déjà vu. Readers wonder, "Have I read this paper before?" No, that was a similar study of a similar product.

Critics of the pharmaceutical and medical-device industry argue that "me-too" products cause problems for medicine beyond confusion. They assert that these market latecomers often differ trivially from earlier products and that the billions of dollars spent marketing me-too products could be spent in better ways, such as developing orphan drugs for . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From Partners Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Related Letters:

"Me-Too" Products — Friend or Foe?
Frothingham R., Relman A. S., Lee T. H.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2100-2101, May 13, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.