The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Perspective
Volume 351:2255-2257 November 25, 2004 Number 22
NextNext

The Cord-Blood-Bank Controversies
Robert Steinbrook, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Sanz, M. A.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Laughlin, M. J.
-Related Article
 by Rocha, V.
-PubMed Citation
Umbilical-cord blood is increasingly used as a source of stem cells to repopulate the bone marrow in the treatment of life-threatening diseases in children and adults (as discussed in this issue of the Journal by Laughlin et al., pages 2265–2275, Rocha et al., pages 2276–2285, and Sanz, pages 2328–2330). This scientific progress, however, has triggered a continuing debate about how to organize cord-blood banks and the role of public and private facilities.

The blood that remains in the placenta after birth is readily available, can be collected at no risk to the mother or newborn, and may be stored frozen . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.