The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:2542-2544 December 9, 2004 Number 24
NextNext

The Economics of ICDs
Sandeep Jauhar, M.D., Ph.D., and David J. Slotwiner, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Hohnloser, S. H.
-PubMed Citation
On September 28, 2004, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed new reimbursement guidelines for implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) used for the prevention of sudden death from cardiac causes. The new guidelines dramatically increase the number of patients for whom prophylactic implantation of an ICD would be covered by Medicare. Among other things, the CMS dispensed with the controversial "QRS restriction" on patients like those who participated in the second Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial — so-called MADIT-II patients. In this trial, which was reported in the Journal in 2002, ICD therapy conferred a striking survival benefit as compared . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the Division of Cardiology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, N.Y.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.