The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:298-300 July 15, 2004 Number 3
NextNext

Bioethics, Science, and Politics

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Blackburn, E.
-Related Article
 by Steinbrook, R.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: In the pursuit of scientific truth, one of the most basic principles is the rigorous exclusion of preexisting bias. Without such exclusion, scientific investigation and experimentation have no validity. Blackburn's account of the recent restructuring of the President's Council on Bioethics (April 1 issue)1 raises the question of why this council, when dealing with an issue of such enormous scientific importance as the future of stem-cell research, is not held to the same standard. If Blackburn is correct, the council's ability to render unbiased recommendations is fatally compromised. Medical research conducted with the same bias would be . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.