Cancer is the most common cause of death in the United States,with more than 500,000 people succumbing each year.1 Despitedramatic advances in the treatment of certain cancers, the vastmajority of patients with metastases die from the cancer. Thesesobering facts have evoked an intensive and increasingly successfulendeavor to unravel the mechanisms that drive the growth ofcancer cells, an enterprise that has produced a large numberof new drugs, especially agents aimed at particular molecules.
Investigations of anticancer drugs follow a characteristic path:in vitro experiments are followed by studies in animals, andthen there is . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Source Information
From the Phase I Program (R.K.) and the Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology (R.S.B.), Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Related Letters:
Phase 1 Clinical Trials in Oncology
Rothschild B. B., King N. M.P., Muggia F. M., Sekine I., Tamura T., Miller M. J., Horstmann E., Emanuel E. J., Grady C., Kurzrock R., Benjamin R. S.
Extract |
Full Text |
PDF
N Engl J Med 2005;
352:2451-2453, Jun 9, 2005.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Graham, J., Hu, J.
(2007). The Risk-Benefit Balance In The United States: Who Decides?. Health Aff (Millwood)
26: 625-635
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sharma, S.
(2006). Phase I Trials May Not Need to Be Viewed As Extraordinarily Different From Other Clinical Research. JCO
24: e47-e47
[Full Text]
Joffe, S., Miller, F. G.
(2006). Rethinking Risk-Benefit Assessment for Phase I Cancer Trials. JCO
24: 2987-2990
[Full Text]
Rosa, D. D., Harris, J., Jayson, G. C.
(2006). The Best Guess Approach to Phase I Trial Design. JCO
24: 206-208
[Full Text]
Rothschild, B. B., King, N. M.P., Muggia, F. M., Sekine, I., Tamura, T., Miller, M. J., Horstmann, E., Emanuel, E. J., Grady, C., Kurzrock, R., Benjamin, R. S.
(2005). Phase 1 Clinical Trials in Oncology. NEJM
352: 2451-2453
[Full Text]