The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Perspective
MEDICARE DRUG BENEFIT

PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:2739-2741 December 29, 2005 Number 26
NextNext

Benefits and Consequences for the Poor and the Disabled
Rachel A. Elliott, Ph.D., Sumit R. Majumdar, M.D., M.P.H., Muriel R. Gillick, M.D., and Stephen B. Soumerai, Sc.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Interview

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
The new Medicare Part D will improve access to medications for millions of Americans. One subgroup of beneficiaries, however, may inadvertently be made worse off: the 7.2 million people enrolled in both Medicaid (because they are poor) and Medicare (because they are elderly or disabled). These beneficiaries, known as the dually eligible, already receive drug benefits through state-run Medicaid programs; but as of 2006, they will be required to enroll in Medicare Part D.

Moving the dually eligible recipients of drug benefits to new federal programs raises several concerns: these beneficiaries may have problems making the transition and negotiating the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

Dr. Elliott is a clinical senior lecturer at the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, and a Commonwealth Fund Harkness Fellow from 2004 to 2005; Dr. Majumdar is an associate professor of medicine at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada; and Dr. Gillick is an associate professor, and Dr. Soumerai a professor, of ambulatory care and prevention at Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.