The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:836-839 August 25, 2005 Number 8
NextNext

Immunosuppression — The Promise of Specificity
Julie R. Ingelfinger, M.D., and Robert S. Schwartz, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Vincenti, F.
-PubMed Citation
The success of organ transplantation owes much to improvements in the immunosuppressive regimens that prevent or suppress allograft rejection. Nevertheless, the potent immunosuppressive drugs that are now in general use increase susceptibility to infection and cancer and can also have adverse effects not directly related to immunosuppression.

Conventional immunosuppressive agents affect not only immune cells but also other cells. Glucocorticoids, for example, can cause a myriad of side effects,1 but these harmful actions are often minimized by combining glucocorticoids with other immunosuppressive medications. In use since the early days of transplantation, small-molecule immunosuppressive drugs act by targeting DNA or proteins . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.