FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 354:1221-1229 March 23, 2006 Number 12 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Interview Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

On February 14, 2006, a U.S. District Court issued an unprecedented ruling concerning the California execution by lethal injection of murderer Michael Morales. The ruling ordered that the state have a physician, specifically an anesthesiologist, personally supervise the execution, or else drastically change the standard protocol for lethal injections.¹ Under the protocol, the anesthetic sodium thiopental is given at massive doses that are expected to stop breathing and extinguish consciousness within one minute after administration; then the paralytic agent pancuronium is given, followed by a fatal dose of potassium chloride.

The judge found, however, that evidence from execution logs showed . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Source Information

Dr. Gawande is a general and endocrine surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital and an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

An interview with Dr. Carlo Musso can be heard at www.nejm.org.

Related Letters:

Why Physicians Participate in Executions
Bonchek L. I., Ellerin B. E., Kramers C., Deinum J., Yaes R. J., Spencer S. S., Gawande A.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 355:99-100, Jul 6, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Larriviere, D., Williams, M. A., Rizzo, M., Bonnie, R. J., On behalf of the AAN Ethics, Law and Humanities Co, (2009). Responding to requests from adult patients for neuroenhancements: Guidance of the Ethics, Law and Humanities Committee. Neurology 73: 1406-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Norko, M. A. (2008). The Death Penalty in Catholic Teaching and Medicine: Intersections and Places for Dialogue. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36: 470-481 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Annas, G. J. (2008). Toxic Tinkering -- Lethal-Injection Execution and the Constitution. NEJM 359: 1512-1518 [Full Text]  
• Lanier, W. L., Berge, K. H. (2008). Physicians Should Desist From Aiding in Executions-reply. Mayo Clin Proc. 83: 122-123 [Full Text]  
• Black, L., Sade, R. M. (2007). Lethal Injection and Physicians: State Law vs Medical Ethics. JAMA 298: 2779-2781 [Full Text]  
• Waisel, D. (2007). Physician Participation in Capital Punishment. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 1073-1080 [Full Text]  
• Lanier, W. L., Berge, K. H. (2007). Physician Involvement in Capital Punishment: Simplifying a Complex Calculus. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 1043-1046 [Full Text]  
• Caplan, A. L. (2007). Should Physicians Participate in Capital Punishment?. Mayo Clin Proc. 82: 1047-1048 [Full Text]  
• Bonchek, L. I., Ellerin, B. E., Kramers, C., Deinum, J., Yaes, R. J., Spencer, S. S., Gawande, A. (2006). Why physicians participate in executions.. NEJM 355: 99-100 [Full Text]  
• Steinbrook, R. (2006). New technology, old dilemma--monitoring EEG activity during executions.. NEJM 354: 2525-2527 [Full Text]