On February 14, 2006, a U.S. District Court issued an unprecedentedruling concerning the California execution by lethal injectionof murderer Michael Morales. The ruling ordered that the statehave a physician, specifically an anesthesiologist, personallysupervise the execution, or else drastically change the standardprotocol for lethal injections.1 Under the protocol, the anestheticsodium thiopental is given at massive doses that are expectedto stop breathing and extinguish consciousness within one minuteafter administration; then the paralytic agent pancuronium isgiven, followed by a fatal dose of potassium chloride.
Dr. Gawande is a general and endocrine surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital and an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
An interview with Dr. Carlo Musso can be heard at www.nejm.org.
Annas, G. J.
(2008). Toxic Tinkering -- Lethal-Injection Execution and the Constitution. NEJM
359: 1512-1518
[Full Text]
Black, L., Sade, R. M.
(2007). Lethal Injection and Physicians: State Law vs Medical Ethics. JAMA
298: 2779-2781
[Full Text]
Bonchek, L. I., Ellerin, B. E., Kramers, C., Deinum, J., Yaes, R. J., Spencer, S. S., Gawande, A.
(2006). Why physicians participate in executions.. NEJM
355: 99-100
[Full Text]
Steinbrook, R.
(2006). New technology, old dilemma--monitoring EEG activity during executions.. NEJM
354: 2525-2527
[Full Text]