The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 355:190-192 July 13, 2006 Number 2
NextNext

Risk–Benefit Profiles of Raloxifene for Women
Marcia L. Stefanick, Ph.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Barrett-Connor, E.
-PubMed Citation
During the past decade, considerable scientific, clinical, and public interest in the benefits and risks of postmenopausal estrogen therapy has focused attention on selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs). These act as estrogen agonists in some tissues and antagonists in others because of specific actions on at least two distinct estrogen receptors, the proportions of which differ across tissues. As such, SERMs have held the promise of conferring benefits similar to those associated with estrogen therapy, including a reduced risk of osteoporosis, while simultaneously reducing estrogen-related risks (e.g., invasive breast cancer). The once widely held belief that estrogen therapy was cardioprotective1 also . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.