The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 357:608-613 August 9, 2007 Number 6
NextNext

The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do It
Andrew D. Auerbach, M.D., M.P.H., C. Seth Landefeld, M.D., and Kaveh G. Shojania, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
The past 7 years have seen unprecedented interest in patient safety and the quality of health care.1,2,3 As physicians whose careers are focused on improving quality and safety, we have welcomed this change. However, we have also witnessed recent initiatives that emphasize dissemination of innovative but unproven strategies, an approach that runs counter to the principle of following the evidence4 in selecting interventions that meet quality and safety goals, as well as the idea that interventions should be tailored to local needs and resources.5 These principles have been used as safeguards in helping us pursue practices that have clear benefits . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Argument 1: We Cannot Wait

Argument 2: Any Effort to Improve Is Better Than the Current State of Affairs

Argument 3: Emulating Successful Organizations Can Speed Improvement

Argument 4: The Effectiveness of Some Quality-Improvement Strategies Is Obvious

Argument 5: Promising but Unproven Strategies Can Catalyze Innovation

Argument 6: The Framework of Evidence-Based Medicine Does Not Apply to Quality Improvement

Argument 7: Developing Evidence in Quality Improvement Is Too Costly

Conclusions


Source Information

From the University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, San Francisco (A.D.A., C.S.L.); San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (C.S.L.); and Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa (K.G.S.).


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.