The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 359:1726-1727 October 16, 2008 Number 16
NextNext

Monovalent Oral Poliovirus Vaccines — A Good Tool but Not a Total Solution
Ellie Ehrenfeld, Ph.D., and Konstantin Chumakov, Ph.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by El-Sayed, N.
-Related Article
 by Jenkins, H. E.
-PubMed Citation
The polio eradication campaign initiated in 1988 by the World Health Organization (WHO) led to an impressive decline in cases of paralytic poliomyelitis around the world. The eradication strategy involved highly organized mass immunization campaigns, relying solely on the trivalent oral polio vaccine developed by Albert Sabin and licensed in the United States in 1963. Monovalent versions of oral polio vaccine had been licensed earlier but were abandoned in favor of the trivalent combination oral polio vaccine to simplify immunization schedules. Efficacy was not considered to be a significant issue, and differences between monovalent and trivalent vaccines were never formally . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.