The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 359:964-966 August 28, 2008 Number 9
NextNext

Treatment of Myeloma — Are We Making Progress?
Brian G.M. Durie, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by San Miguel, J. F.
-PubMed Citation
In this issue of the Journal, San Miguel et al.1 describe the benefit of combining bortezomib with melphalan plus prednisone, as compared with melphalan plus prednisone alone, as initial therapy for patients with myeloma who are not candidates for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. The critical comparative statistics leave no doubt that combination therapy with bortezomib is superior to melphalan plus prednisone alone. But how does this clear-cut evidence inform treatment decisions? To effectively apply these findings to clinical practice in the appropriate setting, we need prospective comparisons with other available options, valid uniform standards for those comparisons, and greater consideration of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the Cedars–Sinai Outpatient Cancer Center at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute and Aptium Oncology — both in Los Angeles.


Related Letters:

Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Multiple Myeloma
Islam A., Ambrus J. L., Avvisati G., Tsubokura M., Kami M., Komatsu T., Miguel J. F. S., van de Velde H., Richardson P. G.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2613-2614, Dec 11, 2008. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.