FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 360:2160-2163 May 21, 2009 Number 21 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

As Congress considers mandating the disclosure of industry gifts and payments to physicians on a searchable federal government Web site,¹ others have been developing proposals for reforming physician–industry relations, and key changes are being made to policies at various academic medical centers, professional societies, and companies. In late April 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a report on conflicts of interest that is notable for its breadth — it covers many aspects of medical research, education, and practice as well as both individual and institutional financial relationships — and the variety of its proposals (see Overview of IOM Recommendations . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Source Information

Dr. Steinbrook (rsteinbrook@attglobal.net) is a national correspondent for the Journal. On November 5, 2007, he spoke at a public session of the IOM Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice.

This article (10.1056/NEJMp0810200) was published at NEJM.org on April 29, 2009.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Campbell, E. G., Rosenthal, M. (2009). Reform of Continuing Medical Education: Investments in Physician Human Capital. JAMA 302: 1807-1808 [Full Text]  
• Healy, W. L., Peterson, R. N. (2009). Department of Justice Investigation of Orthopaedic Industry. JBJS 91: 1791-1805 [Full Text]