The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 360:2242-2244 May 21, 2009 Number 21
NextNext

To Nap or Not to Nap? Residents' Work Hours Revisited
Melvin S. Blanchard, M.D., David Meltzer, M.D., Ph.D., and Kenneth S. Polonsky, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Nuckols, T. K.
-PubMed Citation
The medical profession must provide quality, cost-effective care and seek high standards of patient safety. To improve patient safety in our teaching hospitals, a committee of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently proposed further reductions to duty-hour limits in residency training programs implemented by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2003.1 In this issue of the Journal, Nuckols et al.2 report on the extension of a study commissioned by the IOM to estimate the labor costs and cost-effectiveness of implementing four major IOM recommendations: adherence to the 80-hour workweek, a 5-hour nap during extended shifts, a 16-hour . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (M.S.B., K.S.P.); and the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago (D.M.).


Related Letters:

Residents' Work Hours
Schwenk T. L., Brenner M. J., Auer R., Aujesky D., Rodondi N., Johns M. M.E., Goldberg J. L., Sandroni S., Blanchard M. S., Meltzer D., Polonsky K. S.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2009; 361:928-930, Aug 27, 2009. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.