|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxation has been proposed as a means of reducing the intake of these beverages and thereby lowering health care costs, as well as a means of generating revenue that governments can use for health programs.4,5,6,7 Currently, 33 states
Consumption Trends and Health Outcomes
Mechanisms Linking Sugar-Sweetened Beverages with Poor Health
Economic Rationale
An Effective Tax Policy and Projected Effects
Revenue-Generating Potential
Objections, Industry Reaction, Public Support, and Framing
Conclusions
Source Information
From the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.D.B.); the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, City of New York, New York (T.F.); the Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health (W.C.W.), and the Optimal Weight for Life Program, Children's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School (D.S.L.) — all in Boston; the Department of Nutrition and the University of North Carolina Interdisciplinary Obesity Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (B.M.P.); the Department of Economics and the University of Illinois at Chicago Health Policy Center, University of Illinois, Chicago (F.J.C.); and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Surgeon General's Office, State of Arkansas, Little Rock (J.W.T.).
This article (10.1056/NEJMhpr0905723) was published on September 16, 2009, at NEJM.org.
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |